PDA

View Full Version : Feminism's Enduring Legacy


ReallyOrnery
09-13-2008, 10:34 PM
Auctioning Her Virginity Is Natural Step For Feminist

By Henry Makow

"Natalie Dylan", the 22-year-old San Diego woman who is auctioning her virginity to pay her tuition is a Women's Studies grad.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/ Girl_to_auction_virginity_on_radio_show/articleshow/3468895.cms


Her decision to prostitute herself is the natural result of an "education" ( i.e. indoctrination) that trashes marriage and family. It also shows how feminism, which pretended to oppose the sexual objectification of women, has had the exact opposite effect.

Sounding every bit the feminist, Ms. Dylan (not her real name) says: "I don't have a moral dilemma about it. We live in a capitalist society. Why shouldn't I be allowed to capitalize on my virginity? I understand some people may condemn me. But I think this is empowering. I'm using what I have to better myself."

This girl has a degree in Woman's Studies and yet thinks her most valuable asset is her vagina?

Yet she wishes to raise the price of that commodity by recalling the traditional morality that held virginity in high regard.

Can she have it both ways?

Men put a value on virginity only in a wife. Virginity in a prostitute is not an asset, but a serious liability.

Dylan proposes to complete the transaction at a Nevada brothel where her sister already works. Why would a man pay an exorbitant price for an amateur when he is surrounded by pros?

In 2004, Rosie Reid, an 18-yr. old British lesbian sold her virginity for $20,000. Reid admitted the experience was "horrible" but blessedly brief. "It was horrible. . . I felt nervous and scared," she said.

http://www.stunning-stuff.com/read-weird-news-stories/63.html?ci=3

How much pleasure can a man get from sex with such a woman? Dylan's venture exposes her (and society's) naive attitude about sex. If a man's satisfaction were merely sexual release, he could masturbate. His pleasure comes from the woman's total emotional and physical response to him. A prostitute or a professional virgin is not going to satisfy him.


FEMINISM AND SEX

Sex has become a commodity because feminism has alienated women from their social role as wives and mothers. Divorced from this identity, they are sexual commodities and sex is impersonal physical release.

Inversely, men generally do not see wives and mothers as sex objects. For one thing, another man will thrash them if they do.

Women used to devote their lives to their families and saved their virginity for their husband. This had the effect of creating stable permanent marriages capable of producing healthy children. Families are necessary for our personal development, no matter if we are women , men or children.

Feminism, with its hidden lesbian agenda, is brainwashing and social engineering. It was fostered by the financial elite in order to destabilize family en route to creating a totalitarian state. The destruction of the family was a plank in the Communist Manifesto, which was financed by these same bankers.

Young women today are lost souls, betrayed by their society to think their only value lies in sex appeal and career. They are willing to have promiscuous sex to assuage their sense of worthlessness. This only undermines their chance of marital success.

Ironically, Natalie Dylan wants to use her money to pursue a Master's degree in "Marriage and Family Therapy."


---

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

Related: "How Feminism Killed Courtship on Campus" http://www.savethemales.ca/001573.html

ArcticPhoenix
09-13-2008, 10:50 PM
Pfft. Amateur. There's been a thread about that going on for a couple of days now. Get with the times.

(Oh, and I'm arguing that this is damaging the feminist cause, not helping it, RO, just so you're aware).

Go over to the PROPER SECTION TO POST NEWS STORIES... and read it. :D

ReallyOrnery
09-13-2008, 11:51 PM
Adverts which use sex to sell or promote gender stereotypes could be banned by the EU.

By Chris Irvine


TV regulators have been asked to take a zero tolerance approach to sexist insults and degrading images by the EU's women's rights committee Photo: GETTY
MEPs want TV regulators in the EU to set guidelines which would see the end of anything deemed to portray women as sex objects or reinforce gender stereotypes.

This could potentially mean an end to attractive women advertising perfume, housewives in the kitchen or men doing DIY.

Such classic adverts as the Diet Coke commercial featuring the bare-chested builder, or Wonderbra's "Hello Boys" featuring model Eva Herzigova would have been banned.

The new rules come in a report by the EU's women's rights committee.

Swedish MEP Eva-Britt Svensson urged Britain and other members to use existing equality, sexism and discrimination laws to control advertising.

She wants regulatory bodies set up to monitor ads and introduce a "zero-tolerance" policy against "sexist insults or degrading images".

Ms Svensson said: "Gender stereotyping in advertising straitjackets women, men, girls and boys by restricting individuals to predetermined and artificial roles that are often degrading, humiliating and dumbed down for both sexes."

She added: "Gender stereotyping in advertising is one of several factors that have a big influence in efforts to make society more gender equal.

"When women and men are portrayed in a stereotypical way the consequence may be that it becomes difficult in other contexts to see women and men's resources and abilities."

The Advertising Standards Authority however had said there are already checks in place to prevent "discriminatory or harmful" material.

A spokesman said: "Although the ASA supports the overall objectives of the report... the approach suggested is inflexible and impractical."

Pops In
09-14-2008, 12:18 AM
Fucks sake, Really! Don't you read? We have an ongoing thread in the News section on this topic. Go there fer Christ sake!

flygirl
09-14-2008, 04:27 AM
Well. AP, at least he appears to be on your side, even if he CAN'T read!:D

ArcticPhoenix
09-14-2008, 05:40 AM
Wow, RO... congratulations on being the only human being to ever fail the Turing test.

ReallyOrnery
09-15-2008, 02:43 AM
Fucks sake, Really! Don't you read? We have an ongoing thread in the News section on this topic. Go there fer Christ sake!

Pops In:

I'll post what I want where I want, regardless of whether you like what or where I post or not. You ain't my daddy; and even if you were, I'll kick your butt just as bad as I kicked daddy's butt when he told me how I would live my life. Daddy was a control freak, too, but it did him as much good as it will do you to tell me what to do, which means that it will do you zilch, as in zero; get the message?

RO

holychicken
09-15-2008, 08:20 AM
RO,

I realize that intelligence and observation are not exactly your most redeeming qualities, but the board is actually quite simple and easy to use. I am sure even someone of your limited intelligence can figure it out.

The sub-forum you are in is called "Central Perk" and the description reads, "Hang out and chat in this no debate zone."

Down below it a little ways is another sub-forum called "THE ROUND TABLE" and its description reads "Debates Forums."

Now, do I need to explain to you why this thread does not belong here or do you think you can figure that out on your own?

ArcticPhoenix
09-15-2008, 10:21 PM
Personally, HC, I think you should draw him a diagram. ;)

ReallyOrnery
09-17-2008, 01:55 AM
RO,

I realize that intelligence and observation are not exactly your most redeeming qualities, but the board is actually quite simple and easy to use. I am sure even someone of your limited intelligence can figure it out.

The sub-forum you are in is called "Central Perk" and the description reads, "Hang out and chat in this no debate zone."

Down below it a little ways is another sub-forum called "THE ROUND TABLE" and its description reads "Debates Forums."

Now, do I need to explain to you why this thread does not belong here or do you think you can figure that out on your own?

holychicken:

I have not asked for a debate. In fact, I posted the two articles above as FYI only. If you just gotta comment, then chat, which apparently we are doing already. So, in a way, I am just 'hanging out and chatting in this no debate zone.' In fact, I believe that both articles demonstrate excellent potential for chatting; don't you?

RO

Pops In
09-17-2008, 02:00 AM
::sleep: :sleep: :sleep:

holychicken
09-17-2008, 07:06 AM
holychicken:

I have not asked for a debate. In fact, I posted the two articles above as FYI only. If you just gotta comment, then chat, which apparently we are doing already. So, in a way, I am just 'hanging out and chatting in this no debate zone.' In fact, I believe that both articles demonstrate excellent potential for chatting; don't you?

RO
Are you serious? Wow, you are incredibly stupid. I cannot believe that someone actually thought "you know, this is a good thing to post" whether with the intent to provoke or not.

ReallyOrnery
09-19-2008, 02:05 AM
Are you serious? Wow, you are incredibly stupid. I cannot believe that someone actually thought "you know, this is a good thing to post" whether with the intent to provoke or not.

holychicken:

I see nothing provocative about the two messages with which I opened this thread. In fact, I believed posting them was a good thing. They gave us a glimpse into the thinking of the English, who have radical ideas about feminism when compared to the Americans. Since it is obvious that we are chatting about culture, rather than arguing politics, this forum remains the ideal place for me to have posted them.

More to the point, the only nick here who is having a tantrum is you, and you haven't even commented on the messages. Now that is what I call "incredibly stupid;" know what I mean?

RO

Pops In
09-19-2008, 02:19 AM
K, I read both articles. Pray tell how they coincide? In other words, what has the one to do with the other?